Effectiveness and safety of reirradiation with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy of lung cancer after a first course of thoracic radiation: a meta-analysis (2020)
- Authors:
- USP affiliated authors: ARRUDA, GUSTAVO VIANI - FMRP ; ARRUDA, LÍGIA ISSA DE FENDI - FMRP
- Unidade: FMRP
- DOI: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000709
- Subjects: NEOPLASIAS PULMONARES; RADIOTERAPIA; RESULTADO DE TRATAMENTO
- Keywords: Reirradiaton; Local control; Survival; Meta-analysis
- Language: Inglês
- Imprenta:
- Publisher place: Philadelphia
- Date published: 2020
- Source:
- Título: American Journal of Clinical Oncology
- ISSN: 0277-3732
- Volume/Número/Paginação/Ano: v. 43, n. 8, p. 575-581, 2020
- Status:
- Artigo possui versão em acesso aberto em repositório (Green Open Access)
- Versão do Documento:
- Versão submetida (Pré-print)
- Acessar versão aberta:
-
ABNT
ARRUDA, Gustavo Viani e ARRUDA, Caio Viani e DE FENDI, Lígia Issa. Effectiveness and safety of reirradiation with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy of lung cancer after a first course of thoracic radiation: a meta-analysis. American Journal of Clinical Oncology, v. 43, n. 8, p. 575-581, 2020Tradução . . Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0000000000000709. Acesso em: 02 abr. 2026. -
APA
Arruda, G. V., Arruda, C. V., & De Fendi, L. I. (2020). Effectiveness and safety of reirradiation with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy of lung cancer after a first course of thoracic radiation: a meta-analysis. American Journal of Clinical Oncology, 43( 8), 575-581. doi:10.1097/COC.0000000000000709 -
NLM
Arruda GV, Arruda CV, De Fendi LI. Effectiveness and safety of reirradiation with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy of lung cancer after a first course of thoracic radiation: a meta-analysis [Internet]. American Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2020 ; 43( 8): 575-581.[citado 2026 abr. 02 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0000000000000709 -
Vancouver
Arruda GV, Arruda CV, De Fendi LI. Effectiveness and safety of reirradiation with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy of lung cancer after a first course of thoracic radiation: a meta-analysis [Internet]. American Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2020 ; 43( 8): 575-581.[citado 2026 abr. 02 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0000000000000709 - Partial-breast irradiation versus whole-breast radiotherapy for early breast cancer: a systematic review and update meta-analysis
- Terapias adjuvantes à trabeculectomia: metanálise de ensaios clínicos aleatorizados
- Stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases from small cell lung cancer without prior whole-brain radiotherapy: a meta-analysis
- In reply to Li et al. Letter to the editor. “Once daily (OD) versus twice-daily (BID) chemoradiation for limited stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC): a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.”. [Carta]
- Stereotactic body radiotherapy for prostate cancer: where, when, and who? A bibliometric analysis
- Meta-analysis of elective pelvic nodal irradiation using moderate hypofractionation for high-risk prostate cancer
- Cost-effectiveness analysis comparing intensity-modulated radiotherapy with conformational radiotherapy (3D-RT) for prostate cancer in the brazilian health system
- Sequential or concomitant chemotherapy with hypofractionated radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized trials
- Stereotactic body radiotherapy versus surgery for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: an updated meta-analysis involving 29,511 patients included in comparative studies
- Eficácia e segurança da betaterapia adjuvante pós-ressecção de pterígio: ensaio clínico randomizado com metanálise
Informações sobre a disponibilidade de versões do artigo em acesso aberto coletadas automaticamente via oaDOI API (Unpaywall).
Por se tratar de integração com serviço externo, podem existir diferentes versões do trabalho (como preprints ou postprints), que podem diferir da versão publicada.
Download do texto completo
| Tipo | Nome | Link | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003184546.pdf |
How to cite
A citação é gerada automaticamente e pode não estar totalmente de acordo com as normas