Source: BMC Urology. Unidades: HU, FM
Subjects: CÁLCULOS URINÁRIOS, REVISÃO SISTEMÁTICA, METANÁLISE
ABNT
GONÇALVES, Felipe Giraldo Alvarez et al. Enhanced stone-free rates with suctioning ureteral access sheath vs. traditional sheath in retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Urology, v. 25, n. 1, p. 86, 2025Tradução . . Disponível em: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11987389/pdf/12894_2025_Article_1775.pdf. Acesso em: 27 nov. 2025.APA
Gonçalves, F. G. A., Porto, B. C., Terada, B. D., Spilborghs, J. V. G. T., Passerotti, C. C., Sardenberg, R. A. S., et al. (2025). Enhanced stone-free rates with suctioning ureteral access sheath vs. traditional sheath in retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Urology, 25( 1), 86. doi:10.1186/s12894-025-01775-xNLM
Gonçalves FGA, Porto BC, Terada BD, Spilborghs JVGT, Passerotti CC, Sardenberg RAS, Otoch JP, Cruz JAS da. Enhanced stone-free rates with suctioning ureteral access sheath vs. traditional sheath in retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis [Internet]. BMC Urology. 2025 ; 25( 1): 86.[citado 2025 nov. 27 ] Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11987389/pdf/12894_2025_Article_1775.pdfVancouver
Gonçalves FGA, Porto BC, Terada BD, Spilborghs JVGT, Passerotti CC, Sardenberg RAS, Otoch JP, Cruz JAS da. Enhanced stone-free rates with suctioning ureteral access sheath vs. traditional sheath in retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis [Internet]. BMC Urology. 2025 ; 25( 1): 86.[citado 2025 nov. 27 ] Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11987389/pdf/12894_2025_Article_1775.pdf
