Enhanced stone-free rates with suctioning ureteral access sheath vs. traditional sheath in retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2025)
- Authors:
- USP affiliated authors: OTOCH, JOSE PINHATA - HU ; GONCALVES, FELIPE GIRALDO ALVAREZ - FM ; PORTO, BRENO CORDEIRO - FM ; TERADA, BRUNO DAMICO - FM
- Unidades: HU; FM
- DOI: 10.1186/s12894-025-01775-x
- Subjects: CÁLCULOS URINÁRIOS; REVISÃO SISTEMÁTICA; METANÁLISE
- Language: Inglês
- Imprenta:
- Source:
- Título: BMC Urology
- ISSN: 1471-2490
- Volume/Número/Paginação/Ano: v. 25, n. 1, p. 86, apr. 2025
- Status:
- Artigo publicado em periódico de acesso aberto (Gold Open Access)
- Versão do Documento:
- Versão publicada (Published version)
- Acessar versão aberta:
-
ABNT
GONÇALVES, Felipe Giraldo Alvarez et al. Enhanced stone-free rates with suctioning ureteral access sheath vs. traditional sheath in retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Urology, v. 25, n. 1, p. 86, 2025Tradução . . Disponível em: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11987389/pdf/12894_2025_Article_1775.pdf. Acesso em: 02 abr. 2026. -
APA
Gonçalves, F. G. A., Porto, B. C., Terada, B. D., Spilborghs, J. V. G. T., Passerotti, C. C., Sardenberg, R. A. S., et al. (2025). Enhanced stone-free rates with suctioning ureteral access sheath vs. traditional sheath in retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Urology, 25( 1), 86. doi:10.1186/s12894-025-01775-x -
NLM
Gonçalves FGA, Porto BC, Terada BD, Spilborghs JVGT, Passerotti CC, Sardenberg RAS, Otoch JP, Cruz JAS da. Enhanced stone-free rates with suctioning ureteral access sheath vs. traditional sheath in retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis [Internet]. BMC Urology. 2025 ; 25( 1): 86.[citado 2026 abr. 02 ] Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11987389/pdf/12894_2025_Article_1775.pdf -
Vancouver
Gonçalves FGA, Porto BC, Terada BD, Spilborghs JVGT, Passerotti CC, Sardenberg RAS, Otoch JP, Cruz JAS da. Enhanced stone-free rates with suctioning ureteral access sheath vs. traditional sheath in retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis [Internet]. BMC Urology. 2025 ; 25( 1): 86.[citado 2026 abr. 02 ] Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11987389/pdf/12894_2025_Article_1775.pdf - Does the surgeon's learning curve impact pentafecta outcomes in radical prostatectomy?: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Unveiling the impact of opioid-free postoperative regimens in ureteroscopy: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis
- Pelvic lymph node dissection before versus after radical cystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Optimal stenting duration following ureteroscopy and nephrolithotomy: systematic review and meta-analysis
- Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic ileal ureteral replacement: systematic review and meta-analysis
- Effectiveness of methenamine hippurate in preventing urinary tract infections: an updated systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials
- Description of the Dunning-Kruger effect in general surgery residents during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a blinded prospective study
- GreenLight photoselective laser vaporisation versus transurethral resection of the prostate for large prostates: systematic review and meta-analysis
- Antibiotics prophylaxis at the time of catheter removal after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis
- Comparing financing models for supplementary healthcare in appendectomy: activity-based costing (fee-for-service) vs. diagnosis related group remuneration (bundled payment) - a systematic review and meta-analysis
Informações sobre a disponibilidade de versões do artigo em acesso aberto coletadas automaticamente via oaDOI API (Unpaywall).
Por se tratar de integração com serviço externo, podem existir diferentes versões do trabalho (como preprints ou postprints), que podem diferir da versão publicada.
Download do texto completo
| Tipo | Nome | Link | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3264347.pdf |
How to cite
A citação é gerada automaticamente e pode não estar totalmente de acordo com as normas
