Selective cutoff reporting in studies of the accuracy of the Patient Health Questionnaire‐9 and Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale: Comparison of results based on published cutoffs versus all cutoffs using individual participant data meta‐analysis (2021)
- Authors:
- USP affiliated authors: OSORIO, FLAVIA DE LIMA - FMRP ; LOUREIRO, SONIA REGINA - FMRP ; CHAGAS, MARCOS HORTES NISIHARA - FMRP
- Unidade: FMRP
- DOI: 10.1002/MPR.1873
- Subjects: ATENÇÃO À SAÚDE; ADMINISTRAÇÃO DOS CUIDADOS AO PACIENTE; DEPRESSÃO; DIAGNÓSTICO
- Keywords: Diagnostic test accuracy; Individual participant data meta‐analysis; Meta‐analysis; Publication bias; Selective cutoff reporting
- Agências de fomento:
- Language: Inglês
- Imprenta:
- Source:
- Título: International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
- ISSN: 1049-8931
- Volume/Número/Paginação/Ano: v. 30, art. e1873, p. 1-15, 2021
- Este periódico é de acesso aberto
- Este artigo é de acesso aberto
- URL de acesso aberto
- Cor do Acesso Aberto: green
- Licença: other-oa
-
ABNT
NEUPANE, Dipika et al. Selective cutoff reporting in studies of the accuracy of the Patient Health Questionnaire‐9 and Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale: Comparison of results based on published cutoffs versus all cutoffs using individual participant data meta‐analysis. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, v. 30, p. 1-15, 2021Tradução . . Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1002/MPR.1873. Acesso em: 29 dez. 2025. -
APA
Neupane, D., Levis, B., Bhandari, P. M., Thombs, B. D., Benedetti, A., Loureiro, S. R., et al. (2021). Selective cutoff reporting in studies of the accuracy of the Patient Health Questionnaire‐9 and Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale: Comparison of results based on published cutoffs versus all cutoffs using individual participant data meta‐analysis. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 30, 1-15. doi:10.1002/MPR.1873 -
NLM
Neupane D, Levis B, Bhandari PM, Thombs BD, Benedetti A, Loureiro SR, Osório F de L, Chagas MHN. Selective cutoff reporting in studies of the accuracy of the Patient Health Questionnaire‐9 and Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale: Comparison of results based on published cutoffs versus all cutoffs using individual participant data meta‐analysis [Internet]. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research. 2021 ; 30 1-15.[citado 2025 dez. 29 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/MPR.1873 -
Vancouver
Neupane D, Levis B, Bhandari PM, Thombs BD, Benedetti A, Loureiro SR, Osório F de L, Chagas MHN. Selective cutoff reporting in studies of the accuracy of the Patient Health Questionnaire‐9 and Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale: Comparison of results based on published cutoffs versus all cutoffs using individual participant data meta‐analysis [Internet]. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research. 2021 ; 30 1-15.[citado 2025 dez. 29 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/MPR.1873 - External validation of a shortened screening tool using individual participant data meta-analysis: a case study of the Patient Health Questionnaire-Dep-4
- Comparison of patient health questionnaire-9, edinburgh postnatal depression scale and hospital anxiety and depression – depression subscale scores by administration mode: an individual participant data differential item functioning meta-analysis
- Comparison of different scoring methods based on latent variable models of the PHQ-9: an individual participant data meta-analysis
- Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scores do not accurately estimate depression prevalence: individual participant data meta-analysis
- Assessment and screening of panic disorder in cancer patients: performance of the PHQ-PD
- Screening tools for psychiatry disorders in cancer setting: caution when using
- SDQ: discriminative validity and diagnostic potential
- Equivalency of the diagnostic accuracy of the PHQ-8 and PHQ-9: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis
- The accuracy of the patient health questionnaire-9 algorithm for screening to detect major depression: an individual participant data meta-analysis
- Accuracy of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) for screening to detect major depression: individual participant data meta-analysis
Informações sobre o DOI: 10.1002/MPR.1873 (Fonte: oaDOI API)
Download do texto completo
| Tipo | Nome | Link | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003232595.pdf | Direct link |
How to cite
A citação é gerada automaticamente e pode não estar totalmente de acordo com as normas
