Comparison of different scoring methods based on latent variable models of the PHQ-9: an individual participant data meta-analysis (2022)
- Authors:
- USP affiliated authors: CHAGAS, MARCOS HORTES NISIHARA - FMRP ; LOUREIRO, SONIA REGINA - FMRP ; OSORIO, FLAVIA DE LIMA - FMRP
- Unidade: FMRP
- DOI: 10.1017/S0033291721000131
- Subjects: ANÁLISE FATORIAL; TRIAGEM; DEPRESSÃO
- Keywords: Confirmatory factor analysis; Depression; Latent variable modeling; Screening
- Agências de fomento:
- Language: Inglês
- Imprenta:
- Source:
- Título: Psychological Medicine
- ISSN: 0033-2917
- Volume/Número/Paginação/Ano: on-line, 2022
- Status:
- Artigo possui acesso gratuito no site do editor (Bronze Open Access)
- Versão do Documento:
- Versão publicada (Published version)
- Acessar versão aberta:
-
ABNT
FISCHER, Felix et al. Comparison of different scoring methods based on latent variable models of the PHQ-9: an individual participant data meta-analysis. Psychological Medicine, 2022Tradução . . Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291721000131. Acesso em: 07 abr. 2026. -
APA
Fischer, F., Levis, B., Falk, C., Sun, Y., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Cuijpers, P., et al. (2022). Comparison of different scoring methods based on latent variable models of the PHQ-9: an individual participant data meta-analysis. Psychological Medicine. doi:10.1017/S0033291721000131 -
NLM
Fischer F, Levis B, Falk C, Sun Y, Ioannidis JPA, Cuijpers P, Shrier I, Benedetti A, Thombs BD, Chagas MHN, Loureiro SR, Osório F de L. Comparison of different scoring methods based on latent variable models of the PHQ-9: an individual participant data meta-analysis [Internet]. Psychological Medicine. 2022 ;[citado 2026 abr. 07 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291721000131 -
Vancouver
Fischer F, Levis B, Falk C, Sun Y, Ioannidis JPA, Cuijpers P, Shrier I, Benedetti A, Thombs BD, Chagas MHN, Loureiro SR, Osório F de L. Comparison of different scoring methods based on latent variable models of the PHQ-9: an individual participant data meta-analysis [Internet]. Psychological Medicine. 2022 ;[citado 2026 abr. 07 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291721000131 - Comparison of patient health questionnaire-9, edinburgh postnatal depression scale and hospital anxiety and depression – depression subscale scores by administration mode: an individual participant data differential item functioning meta-analysis
- Selective cutoff reporting in studies of the accuracy of the Patient Health Questionnaire‐9 and Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale: Comparison of results based on published cutoffs versus all cutoffs using individual participant data meta‐analysis
- External validation of a shortened screening tool using individual participant data meta-analysis: a case study of the Patient Health Questionnaire-Dep-4
- Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scores do not accurately estimate depression prevalence: individual participant data meta-analysis
- Assessment and screening of panic disorder in cancer patients: performance of the PHQ-PD
- Screening tools for psychiatry disorders in cancer setting: caution when using
- SDQ: discriminative validity and diagnostic potential
- Selective cutoff reporting in studies of diagnostic test accuracy: a comparison of conventional and individual-patient-data meta-analyses of the patient health questionnaire-9 depression screening tool
- Accuracy of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) for screening to detect major depression: individual participant data meta-analysis
- A case study of an individual participant data meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy showed that prediction regions represented heterogeneity well
Informações sobre a disponibilidade de versões do artigo em acesso aberto coletadas automaticamente via oaDOI API (Unpaywall).
Por se tratar de integração com serviço externo, podem existir diferentes versões do trabalho (como preprints ou postprints), que podem diferir da versão publicada.
How to cite
A citação é gerada automaticamente e pode não estar totalmente de acordo com as normas
