Fonte: Brazilian Oral Research. Unidade: FO
Assuntos: ODONTOLOGIA, CANAL RADICULAR, INSTRUMENTOS ODONTOLÓGICOS, MOLAR, MICROTOMOGRAFIA
A citação é gerada automaticamente e pode não estar totalmente de acordo com as normas
ABNT
VENTURA, Breno Nappi et al. Using manual versus mechanized glide path instruments and ProTaper Gold versus ProTaper Next systems in curved canals: micro-CT study. Brazilian Oral Research, n. Ja 2024, 2024Tradução . . Acesso em: 18 nov. 2025.APA
Ventura, B. N., Gavini, G., Iglecias, E. F., Gusukuma, L. G. F., & Caldeira, C. L. (2024). Using manual versus mechanized glide path instruments and ProTaper Gold versus ProTaper Next systems in curved canals: micro-CT study. Brazilian Oral Research, ( Ja 2024). doi:10.1590/1807-3107bor-2024.vol38.0006NLM
Ventura BN, Gavini G, Iglecias EF, Gusukuma LGF, Caldeira CL. Using manual versus mechanized glide path instruments and ProTaper Gold versus ProTaper Next systems in curved canals: micro-CT study. Brazilian Oral Research. 2024 ;( Ja 2024):[citado 2025 nov. 18 ]Vancouver
Ventura BN, Gavini G, Iglecias EF, Gusukuma LGF, Caldeira CL. Using manual versus mechanized glide path instruments and ProTaper Gold versus ProTaper Next systems in curved canals: micro-CT study. Brazilian Oral Research. 2024 ;( Ja 2024):[citado 2025 nov. 18 ]
