UV 254 nm is more efficient than UV 222 nm in inactivating SARS-CoV-2 present in human saliva (2022)
Sesti-Costa, Renata; Ambrosio, Andre Luis Berteli 
Fonte: Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy. Unidade: IFSC
Assuntos: CORONAVIRUS, RADIAÇÃO ULTRAVIOLETA
A citação é gerada automaticamente e pode não estar totalmente de acordo com as normas
ABNT
SESTI-COSTA, Renata e AMBROSIO, Andre Luis Berteli. UV 254 nm is more efficient than UV 222 nm in inactivating SARS-CoV-2 present in human saliva. Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy, v. 39, p. 103015-1-103015-8, 2022Tradução . . Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2022.103015. Acesso em: 15 nov. 2025.APA
Sesti-Costa, R., & Ambrosio, A. L. B. (2022). UV 254 nm is more efficient than UV 222 nm in inactivating SARS-CoV-2 present in human saliva. Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy, 39, 103015-1-103015-8. doi:10.1016/j.pdpdt.2022.103015NLM
Sesti-Costa R, Ambrosio ALB. UV 254 nm is more efficient than UV 222 nm in inactivating SARS-CoV-2 present in human saliva [Internet]. Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy. 2022 ; 39 103015-1-103015-8.[citado 2025 nov. 15 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2022.103015Vancouver
Sesti-Costa R, Ambrosio ALB. UV 254 nm is more efficient than UV 222 nm in inactivating SARS-CoV-2 present in human saliva [Internet]. Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy. 2022 ; 39 103015-1-103015-8.[citado 2025 nov. 15 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2022.103015
