Fonte: Clean Technologies. Unidades: RUSP, FFCLRP, EEL, FMRP
Assuntos: CANA-DE-AÇÚCAR, TRICHODERMA, TAMARINDO, ENZIMAS
ABNT
CONTATO, Alex Graça et al. Comparative analysis of CAZymes from Trichoderma longibrachiatum LMBC 172 cultured with three different carbon sources: sugarcane bagasse, tamarind seeds, and hemicellulose simulation. Clean Technologies, v. 6, n. 3, p. 994-1010, 2024Tradução . . Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.3390/cleantechnol6030050. Acesso em: 08 out. 2025.APA
Contato, A. G., Borelli, T. C., Carvalho, A. K. F. de, Bento, H. B. S., Buckeridge, M., Rogers, J., et al. (2024). Comparative analysis of CAZymes from Trichoderma longibrachiatum LMBC 172 cultured with three different carbon sources: sugarcane bagasse, tamarind seeds, and hemicellulose simulation. Clean Technologies, 6( 3), 994-1010. doi:10.3390/cleantechnol6030050NLM
Contato AG, Borelli TC, Carvalho AKF de, Bento HBS, Buckeridge M, Rogers J, Hartson S, Prade RA, Polizeli MDLTDM. Comparative analysis of CAZymes from Trichoderma longibrachiatum LMBC 172 cultured with three different carbon sources: sugarcane bagasse, tamarind seeds, and hemicellulose simulation [Internet]. Clean Technologies. 2024 ; 6( 3): 994-1010.[citado 2025 out. 08 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/cleantechnol6030050Vancouver
Contato AG, Borelli TC, Carvalho AKF de, Bento HBS, Buckeridge M, Rogers J, Hartson S, Prade RA, Polizeli MDLTDM. Comparative analysis of CAZymes from Trichoderma longibrachiatum LMBC 172 cultured with three different carbon sources: sugarcane bagasse, tamarind seeds, and hemicellulose simulation [Internet]. Clean Technologies. 2024 ; 6( 3): 994-1010.[citado 2025 out. 08 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/cleantechnol6030050