Comparison of classical and modern methods for measuring and correcting for acquiescence (2019)
Primi, Ricardo; Santos, Daniel Domingues dos 
; De Fruyt, Filip; John, Oliver P.
Source: British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. Unidade: FEARP
Subjects: PSICOLOGIA SOCIAL, HABILIDADES SOCIAIS, PSICOMETRIA, AUTORRELATO, INVENTÁRIO DE PERSONALIDADE PARA CRIANÇAS
A citação é gerada automaticamente e pode não estar totalmente de acordo com as normas
ABNT
PRIMI, Ricardo et al. Comparison of classical and modern methods for measuring and correcting for acquiescence. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, v. 72, n. 3, p. 447-465, 2019Tradução . . Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12168. Acesso em: 13 nov. 2024.APA
Primi, R., Santos, D. D. dos, De Fruyt, F., & John, O. P. (2019). Comparison of classical and modern methods for measuring and correcting for acquiescence. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 72( 3), 447-465. doi:10.1111/bmsp.12168NLM
Primi R, Santos DD dos, De Fruyt F, John OP. Comparison of classical and modern methods for measuring and correcting for acquiescence [Internet]. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. 2019 ; 72( 3): 447-465.[citado 2024 nov. 13 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12168Vancouver
Primi R, Santos DD dos, De Fruyt F, John OP. Comparison of classical and modern methods for measuring and correcting for acquiescence [Internet]. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. 2019 ; 72( 3): 447-465.[citado 2024 nov. 13 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12168
