Source: Clinical Immunology. Unidade: FM
Subjects: TRANSPLANTE DE MEDULA ÓSSEA (IMUNOLOGIA), MEMÓRIA, HEMATOPOESE, INFLAMAÇÃO
ABNT
FERRARI, Valeria et al. Distinct patterns of regeneration of central memory, effector memory and effector TCD8 + cell subsets after different hematopoietic cell transplant types: possible influence in the recovery of anti-cytomegalovirus immune response and risk for its reactivation. Clinical Immunology, v. 119, p. 261-271, 2006Tradução . . Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clim.2005.12.001. Acesso em: 11 set. 2024.APA
Ferrari, V., Cacere, C. R., Machado, C. M., Pannuti, C. S., Dulley, F. L., Barros, J. C. A., et al. (2006). Distinct patterns of regeneration of central memory, effector memory and effector TCD8 + cell subsets after different hematopoietic cell transplant types: possible influence in the recovery of anti-cytomegalovirus immune response and risk for its reactivation. Clinical Immunology, 119, 261-271. doi:10.1016/j.clim.2005.12.001NLM
Ferrari V, Cacere CR, Machado CM, Pannuti CS, Dulley FL, Barros JCA, Duarte AJ da S, Benard G. Distinct patterns of regeneration of central memory, effector memory and effector TCD8 + cell subsets after different hematopoietic cell transplant types: possible influence in the recovery of anti-cytomegalovirus immune response and risk for its reactivation [Internet]. Clinical Immunology. 2006 ; 119 261-271.[citado 2024 set. 11 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clim.2005.12.001Vancouver
Ferrari V, Cacere CR, Machado CM, Pannuti CS, Dulley FL, Barros JCA, Duarte AJ da S, Benard G. Distinct patterns of regeneration of central memory, effector memory and effector TCD8 + cell subsets after different hematopoietic cell transplant types: possible influence in the recovery of anti-cytomegalovirus immune response and risk for its reactivation [Internet]. Clinical Immunology. 2006 ; 119 261-271.[citado 2024 set. 11 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clim.2005.12.001