Source: Clinics. Unidade: FMRP
Subjects: DOENÇAS DO RECÉM-NASCIDO, ABDOME (ANORMALIDADES;CIRURGIA)
A citação é gerada automaticamente e pode não estar totalmente de acordo com as normas
ABNT
NAKIRI, Guilherme S. et al. A comparison between magnetic resonance angiography at 3 teslas (time-of-flight and contrast-enhanced) and flat-panel digital subtraction angiography in the assessment of embolized brain aneurysms. Clinics, v. 66, n. 4, p. 641-648, 2011Tradução . . Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/s1807-59322011000400020. Acesso em: 16 out. 2024.APA
Nakiri, G. S., Santos, A. C. dos, Abud, T. G., Aragon, D. C., Colli, B. O., & Abud, D. G. (2011). A comparison between magnetic resonance angiography at 3 teslas (time-of-flight and contrast-enhanced) and flat-panel digital subtraction angiography in the assessment of embolized brain aneurysms. Clinics, 66( 4), 641-648. doi:10.1590/s1807-59322011000400020NLM
Nakiri GS, Santos AC dos, Abud TG, Aragon DC, Colli BO, Abud DG. A comparison between magnetic resonance angiography at 3 teslas (time-of-flight and contrast-enhanced) and flat-panel digital subtraction angiography in the assessment of embolized brain aneurysms [Internet]. Clinics. 2011 ; 66( 4): 641-648.[citado 2024 out. 16 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/s1807-59322011000400020Vancouver
Nakiri GS, Santos AC dos, Abud TG, Aragon DC, Colli BO, Abud DG. A comparison between magnetic resonance angiography at 3 teslas (time-of-flight and contrast-enhanced) and flat-panel digital subtraction angiography in the assessment of embolized brain aneurysms [Internet]. Clinics. 2011 ; 66( 4): 641-648.[citado 2024 out. 16 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/s1807-59322011000400020
