Powell, Erin C 
; Willmott, Nikolas J; Selleck, Caitlin J ; Painting, Christina J ; Hickey, Anthony J; Machado, Glauco ; Holwell, Gregory I
Fonte: Animal Behaviour. Unidade: IB
Assuntos: OPILIONA, PREDAÇÃO (BIOLOGIA), COMPORTAMENTO DEFENSIVO ANIMAL, ARACNÍDEOS
A citação é gerada automaticamente e pode não estar totalmente de acordo com as normas
ABNT
POWELL, Erin C et al. No risk to scrambling? Mating tactic does not affect the frequency of leg autotomy in a New Zealand harvestman. Animal Behaviour, v. 177, p. 99-106, 2021Tradução . . Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2021.04.015. Acesso em: 29 set. 2024.APA
Powell, E. C., Willmott, N. J., Selleck, C. J., Painting, C. J., Hickey, A. J., Machado, G., & Holwell, G. I. (2021). No risk to scrambling? Mating tactic does not affect the frequency of leg autotomy in a New Zealand harvestman. Animal Behaviour, 177, 99-106. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2021.04.015NLM
Powell EC, Willmott NJ, Selleck CJ, Painting CJ, Hickey AJ, Machado G, Holwell GI. No risk to scrambling? Mating tactic does not affect the frequency of leg autotomy in a New Zealand harvestman [Internet]. Animal Behaviour. 2021 ; 177 99-106.[citado 2024 set. 29 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2021.04.015Vancouver
Powell EC, Willmott NJ, Selleck CJ, Painting CJ, Hickey AJ, Machado G, Holwell GI. No risk to scrambling? Mating tactic does not affect the frequency of leg autotomy in a New Zealand harvestman [Internet]. Animal Behaviour. 2021 ; 177 99-106.[citado 2024 set. 29 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2021.04.015
