Source: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Conference titles: ASGE Meeting. Unidade: FM
Subjects: ULTRASSONOGRAFIA, COLANGIOGRAFIA
ABNT
NEY, Marcus V. S. et al. Prospective comparison of endoscopic ultrassonography (EUS) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) in the diagnosis of choledocholitiasis: the influence of the duct diameter and the stone size. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, v. 57, n. 5, 2003Tradução . . Acesso em: 15 out. 2024.APA
Ney, M. V. S., Maluf Filho, F., Sakai, P., Zilberstein, B., Gama Rodrigues, J. J., & Rosa, H. (2003). Prospective comparison of endoscopic ultrassonography (EUS) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) in the diagnosis of choledocholitiasis: the influence of the duct diameter and the stone size. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 57( 5).NLM
Ney MVS, Maluf Filho F, Sakai P, Zilberstein B, Gama Rodrigues JJ, Rosa H. Prospective comparison of endoscopic ultrassonography (EUS) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) in the diagnosis of choledocholitiasis: the influence of the duct diameter and the stone size. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2003 ; 57( 5):[citado 2024 out. 15 ]Vancouver
Ney MVS, Maluf Filho F, Sakai P, Zilberstein B, Gama Rodrigues JJ, Rosa H. Prospective comparison of endoscopic ultrassonography (EUS) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) in the diagnosis of choledocholitiasis: the influence of the duct diameter and the stone size. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2003 ; 57( 5):[citado 2024 out. 15 ]