Source: Bioceramics Development and Applications. Unidade: EESC
Assunto: REPARO ÓSSEO
A citação é gerada automaticamente e pode não estar totalmente de acordo com as normas
ABNT
HAACH, Lourdes Cristina de Albuquerque et al. Comparison of two composites developed to be used as bone replacement - PMMA/Bioglass 45S5® microfiber and PMMA/Hydroxyapatite. Bioceramics Development and Applications, v. 4, n. 1, p. 1000071( 1-3), 2014Tradução . . Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.4172/2090-5025.1000071. Acesso em: 29 jun. 2024.APA
Haach, L. C. de A., Purquerio, B. de M., Silva Junior, N. F. da, Gaspar, A. M. M., & Fortulan, C. A. (2014). Comparison of two composites developed to be used as bone replacement - PMMA/Bioglass 45S5® microfiber and PMMA/Hydroxyapatite. Bioceramics Development and Applications, 4( 1), 1000071( 1-3). doi:10.4172/2090-5025.1000071NLM
Haach LC de A, Purquerio B de M, Silva Junior NF da, Gaspar AMM, Fortulan CA. Comparison of two composites developed to be used as bone replacement - PMMA/Bioglass 45S5® microfiber and PMMA/Hydroxyapatite [Internet]. Bioceramics Development and Applications. 2014 ; 4( 1): 1000071( 1-3).[citado 2024 jun. 29 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.4172/2090-5025.1000071Vancouver
Haach LC de A, Purquerio B de M, Silva Junior NF da, Gaspar AMM, Fortulan CA. Comparison of two composites developed to be used as bone replacement - PMMA/Bioglass 45S5® microfiber and PMMA/Hydroxyapatite [Internet]. Bioceramics Development and Applications. 2014 ; 4( 1): 1000071( 1-3).[citado 2024 jun. 29 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.4172/2090-5025.1000071
