Source: LWT- Food Science and Technology. Unidades: FCF, ICB, ESALQ
Subjects: ALIMENTOS FORTIFICADOS, AMINOÁCIDOS, ESPECTROMETRIA DE MASSAS, MILHO, PROTEÍNAS DE PLANTAS, PROTEÔMICA, VARIEDADES VEGETAIS
A citação é gerada automaticamente e pode não estar totalmente de acordo com as normas
ABNT
DONADO, Priscila Robertina dos Santos et al. Comparative analysis of the protein profile from biofortified cultivars of quality protein maize and conventional maize by gel-based and gel-free proteomic approaches. LWT- Food Science and Technology, v. 138, p. 20 , 2021Tradução . . Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2020.110683. Acesso em: 12 nov. 2024.APA
Donado, P. R. dos S., Pestana, C. M. D., Kawahara, R., Fernandes, L. R., Finardi Filho, F., & Palmisano, G. (2021). Comparative analysis of the protein profile from biofortified cultivars of quality protein maize and conventional maize by gel-based and gel-free proteomic approaches. LWT- Food Science and Technology, 138, 20 . doi:10.1016/j.lwt.2020.110683NLM
Donado PR dos S, Pestana CMD, Kawahara R, Fernandes LR, Finardi Filho F, Palmisano G. Comparative analysis of the protein profile from biofortified cultivars of quality protein maize and conventional maize by gel-based and gel-free proteomic approaches [Internet]. LWT- Food Science and Technology. 2021 ; 138 20 .[citado 2024 nov. 12 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2020.110683Vancouver
Donado PR dos S, Pestana CMD, Kawahara R, Fernandes LR, Finardi Filho F, Palmisano G. Comparative analysis of the protein profile from biofortified cultivars of quality protein maize and conventional maize by gel-based and gel-free proteomic approaches [Internet]. LWT- Food Science and Technology. 2021 ; 138 20 .[citado 2024 nov. 12 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2020.110683