Source: Biomass & Bioenergy. Unidades: CENA, ESALQ
Subjects: BIOENERGIA, BIOMASSA, CANA-DE-AÇÚCAR, EFEITO ESTUFA, ETANOL, FERTILIZANTES NITROGENADOS, GASES, NITROGÊNIO, PALHAS
ABNT
BORGES, Clovis D et al. Can alternative N-fertilization methods influence GHG emissions and biomass production in sugarcane fields?. Biomass & Bioenergy, v. 120, p. 21-27, 2019Tradução . . Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.10.017. Acesso em: 02 nov. 2024.APA
Borges, C. D., Carvalho, J. L. N., Kolln, O. T., Sanches, G. M., Silva, M. J., Castro, S. G. Q., et al. (2019). Can alternative N-fertilization methods influence GHG emissions and biomass production in sugarcane fields? Biomass & Bioenergy, 120, 21-27. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.10.017NLM
Borges CD, Carvalho JLN, Kolln OT, Sanches GM, Silva MJ, Castro SGQ, Castro SAQ de, Sousa LL, Oliveira JVC, Cantarella H, Vargas VP, Mui TS, Franco HCJ. Can alternative N-fertilization methods influence GHG emissions and biomass production in sugarcane fields? [Internet]. Biomass & Bioenergy. 2019 ; 120 21-27.[citado 2024 nov. 02 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.10.017Vancouver
Borges CD, Carvalho JLN, Kolln OT, Sanches GM, Silva MJ, Castro SGQ, Castro SAQ de, Sousa LL, Oliveira JVC, Cantarella H, Vargas VP, Mui TS, Franco HCJ. Can alternative N-fertilization methods influence GHG emissions and biomass production in sugarcane fields? [Internet]. Biomass & Bioenergy. 2019 ; 120 21-27.[citado 2024 nov. 02 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.10.017