Source: Biological Conservation. Unidade: ESALQ
Subjects: TOMADA DE DECISÃO, CONSERVAÇÃO BIOLÓGICA, DISTRIBUIÇÃO ESPACIAL, BIODIVERSIDADE, ECOLOGIA
A citação é gerada automaticamente e pode não estar totalmente de acordo com as normas
ABNT
TULLOCH, Ayesha I. T et al. Conservation planners tend to ignore improved accuracy of modelled species distributions to focus on multiple threats and ecological processes. Biological Conservation, v. 199, n. 1, p. 157-171, 2016Tradução . . Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.04.023. Acesso em: 17 out. 2024.APA
Tulloch, A. I. T., Sutcliffe, P., Naujokaitis-Lewis, I., Tingley, R., Brotons, L., Ferraz, K. M. P. M. de B., et al. (2016). Conservation planners tend to ignore improved accuracy of modelled species distributions to focus on multiple threats and ecological processes. Biological Conservation, 199( 1), 157-171. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2016.04.023NLM
Tulloch AIT, Sutcliffe P, Naujokaitis-Lewis I, Tingley R, Brotons L, Ferraz KMPM de B, Possingham H, Guisan A, Rhodes JR. Conservation planners tend to ignore improved accuracy of modelled species distributions to focus on multiple threats and ecological processes [Internet]. Biological Conservation. 2016 ; 199( 1): 157-171.[citado 2024 out. 17 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.04.023Vancouver
Tulloch AIT, Sutcliffe P, Naujokaitis-Lewis I, Tingley R, Brotons L, Ferraz KMPM de B, Possingham H, Guisan A, Rhodes JR. Conservation planners tend to ignore improved accuracy of modelled species distributions to focus on multiple threats and ecological processes [Internet]. Biological Conservation. 2016 ; 199( 1): 157-171.[citado 2024 out. 17 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.04.023