Source: International Urogynecology Journal. Unidades: HU, FM
Subjects: ESTUDOS RANDOMIZADOS, VAGINA (FISIOPATOLOGIA), PROCEDIMENTOS CIRÚRGICOS EM GINECOLOGIA
A citação é gerada automaticamente e pode não estar totalmente de acordo com as normas
ABNT
SILVEIRA, Simone dos Reis Brandão da et al. Multicenter, randomized trial comparing native vaginal tissue repair and synthetic mesh repair for genital prolapse surgical treatment. International Urogynecology Journal, v. 26, n. 3, p. 335-342, 2015Tradução . . Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2501-z. Acesso em: 28 out. 2024.APA
Silveira, S. dos R. B. da, Haddad, J. M., Jármy-Di Bella, Z. I. K. de, Nastri, F., Kawabata, M. G. M., Carramão, S. da S., et al. (2015). Multicenter, randomized trial comparing native vaginal tissue repair and synthetic mesh repair for genital prolapse surgical treatment. International Urogynecology Journal, 26( 3), 335-342. doi:10.1007/s00192-014-2501-zNLM
Silveira S dos RB da, Haddad JM, Jármy-Di Bella ZIK de, Nastri F, Kawabata MGM, Carramão S da S, Rodrigues CA, Baracat EC, Auge APF. Multicenter, randomized trial comparing native vaginal tissue repair and synthetic mesh repair for genital prolapse surgical treatment [Internet]. International Urogynecology Journal. 2015 ; 26( 3): 335-342.[citado 2024 out. 28 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2501-zVancouver
Silveira S dos RB da, Haddad JM, Jármy-Di Bella ZIK de, Nastri F, Kawabata MGM, Carramão S da S, Rodrigues CA, Baracat EC, Auge APF. Multicenter, randomized trial comparing native vaginal tissue repair and synthetic mesh repair for genital prolapse surgical treatment [Internet]. International Urogynecology Journal. 2015 ; 26( 3): 335-342.[citado 2024 out. 28 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2501-z