Source: Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part B. Unidade: CENA
Subjects: HERBICIDAS, PIRÓLISE, CORRETIVOS DO SOLO, BIOCARVÃO
ABNT
GIBBERT, Anderson Marcel et al. Raw feedstock vs. biochar from olive stone: impact on the sorption–desorption of diclosulam and tropical soil improvement. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part B, p. 1-15, 2024Tradução . . Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1080/03601234.2024.2414360. Acesso em: 13 nov. 2024.APA
Gibbert, A. M., Guimarães, T., Silva, E. M. G. da, Silva, L. B. X. da, Vilca, F. Z., & Mendes, K. F. (2024). Raw feedstock vs. biochar from olive stone: impact on the sorption–desorption of diclosulam and tropical soil improvement. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part B, 1-15. doi:10.1080/03601234.2024.2414360NLM
Gibbert AM, Guimarães T, Silva EMG da, Silva LBX da, Vilca FZ, Mendes KF. Raw feedstock vs. biochar from olive stone: impact on the sorption–desorption of diclosulam and tropical soil improvement [Internet]. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part B. 2024 ; 1-15.[citado 2024 nov. 13 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/03601234.2024.2414360Vancouver
Gibbert AM, Guimarães T, Silva EMG da, Silva LBX da, Vilca FZ, Mendes KF. Raw feedstock vs. biochar from olive stone: impact on the sorption–desorption of diclosulam and tropical soil improvement [Internet]. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part B. 2024 ; 1-15.[citado 2024 nov. 13 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/03601234.2024.2414360