Source: Imaging Science in Dentistry. Unidades: FO, FORP
Subjects: TOMOGRAFIA COMPUTADORIZADA DE EMISSÃO, IMPLANTES DENTÁRIOS
A citação é gerada automaticamente e pode não estar totalmente de acordo com as normas
ABNT
KIM, Jun Ho et al. Comparison between different cone-beam computed tomography devices in the detection of mechanically simulated peri-implant bone defects. Imaging Science in Dentistry, v. 50, n. 2, p. 133-139, 2020Tradução . . Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.2020.50.2.133. Acesso em: 17 nov. 2024.APA
Kim, J. H., Abdala-Júnior, R., Munhoz, L., Costa, C., Cortez, A. R. G., Watanabe, P. C. A., & Arita, E. S. (2020). Comparison between different cone-beam computed tomography devices in the detection of mechanically simulated peri-implant bone defects. Imaging Science in Dentistry, 50( 2), 133-139. doi:10.5624/isd.2020.50.2.133NLM
Kim JH, Abdala-Júnior R, Munhoz L, Costa C, Cortez ARG, Watanabe PCA, Arita ES. Comparison between different cone-beam computed tomography devices in the detection of mechanically simulated peri-implant bone defects [Internet]. Imaging Science in Dentistry. 2020 ; 50( 2): 133-139.[citado 2024 nov. 17 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.2020.50.2.133Vancouver
Kim JH, Abdala-Júnior R, Munhoz L, Costa C, Cortez ARG, Watanabe PCA, Arita ES. Comparison between different cone-beam computed tomography devices in the detection of mechanically simulated peri-implant bone defects [Internet]. Imaging Science in Dentistry. 2020 ; 50( 2): 133-139.[citado 2024 nov. 17 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.2020.50.2.133
