Fonte: International Urogynecology Journal. Unidade: FMRP
Assuntos: GRAVIDEZ, CESÁREA, PARTO, SOALHO PÉLVICO
ABNT
DRIUSSO, Patricia et al. Commentary on Are there differences in short-term pelvic floor muscle function after cesarean section or vaginal delivery in primiparous women? A systematic review with meta-analysis. [Carta]. International Urogynecology Journal. London: Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-021-05000-9. Acesso em: 08 nov. 2024. , 2021APA
Driusso, P., Beleza, A. C. S., Sato, T. de O., Cavalli, R. de C., Ferreira, C. H. J., & Moreira, R. de F. C. (2021). Commentary on Are there differences in short-term pelvic floor muscle function after cesarean section or vaginal delivery in primiparous women? A systematic review with meta-analysis. [Carta]. International Urogynecology Journal. London: Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo. doi:10.1007/s00192-021-05000-9NLM
Driusso P, Beleza ACS, Sato T de O, Cavalli R de C, Ferreira CHJ, Moreira R de FC. Commentary on Are there differences in short-term pelvic floor muscle function after cesarean section or vaginal delivery in primiparous women? A systematic review with meta-analysis. [Carta] [Internet]. International Urogynecology Journal. 2021 ; 33( 1): 165-166.[citado 2024 nov. 08 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-021-05000-9Vancouver
Driusso P, Beleza ACS, Sato T de O, Cavalli R de C, Ferreira CHJ, Moreira R de FC. Commentary on Are there differences in short-term pelvic floor muscle function after cesarean section or vaginal delivery in primiparous women? A systematic review with meta-analysis. [Carta] [Internet]. International Urogynecology Journal. 2021 ; 33( 1): 165-166.[citado 2024 nov. 08 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-021-05000-9