Subjects: FERIMENTOS E LESÕES, CICATRIZAÇÃO, CUSTOS DOS CUIDADOS DE SAÚDE
ABNT
KAMAMOTO, Fabio et al. A new low-cost negative-pressure wound therapy versus a commercially available therapy device widely used to treat complex traumatic injuries: a prospective, randomized, non-inferiority trial. Clinics, v. 72, n. 12, p. 737-742, 2017Tradução . . Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2017(12)04. Acesso em: 10 out. 2024.APA
Kamamoto, F., Lima, A. L. M., Rezende, M. R. de, Mattar-Junior, R., Leonhardt, M. de C., Kojima, K. E., & Santos, C. C. dos. (2017). A new low-cost negative-pressure wound therapy versus a commercially available therapy device widely used to treat complex traumatic injuries: a prospective, randomized, non-inferiority trial. Clinics, 72( 12), 737-742. doi:10.6061/clinics/2017(12)04NLM
Kamamoto F, Lima ALM, Rezende MR de, Mattar-Junior R, Leonhardt M de C, Kojima KE, Santos CC dos. A new low-cost negative-pressure wound therapy versus a commercially available therapy device widely used to treat complex traumatic injuries: a prospective, randomized, non-inferiority trial [Internet]. Clinics. 2017 ; 72( 12): 737-742.[citado 2024 out. 10 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2017(12)04Vancouver
Kamamoto F, Lima ALM, Rezende MR de, Mattar-Junior R, Leonhardt M de C, Kojima KE, Santos CC dos. A new low-cost negative-pressure wound therapy versus a commercially available therapy device widely used to treat complex traumatic injuries: a prospective, randomized, non-inferiority trial [Internet]. Clinics. 2017 ; 72( 12): 737-742.[citado 2024 out. 10 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2017(12)04