Source: Arquivos de Gastroenterologia. Unidade: FM
Subjects: ENDOSSONOGRAFIA, COLANGIOGRAFIA, ENDOSCOPIA, COLELÍTIASE (DIAGNÓSTICO), DUCTO BILIAR COMUM
A citação é gerada automaticamente e pode não estar totalmente de acordo com as normas
ABNT
NEY, Marcus Vinicius Silva et al. Endoscopic ultrasound versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: the influence of the size of the stone and diameter of the common bile duct. Arquivos de Gastroenterologia, v. 42, n. 4, p. 239-243, 2005Tradução . . Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/s0004-28032005000400009. Acesso em: 06 nov. 2024.APA
Ney, M. V. S., Maluf Filho, F., Sakai, P., Zilberstein, B., Gama Rodrigues, J. J., & Rosa, H. (2005). Endoscopic ultrasound versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: the influence of the size of the stone and diameter of the common bile duct. Arquivos de Gastroenterologia, 42( 4), 239-243. doi:10.1590/s0004-28032005000400009NLM
Ney MVS, Maluf Filho F, Sakai P, Zilberstein B, Gama Rodrigues JJ, Rosa H. Endoscopic ultrasound versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: the influence of the size of the stone and diameter of the common bile duct [Internet]. Arquivos de Gastroenterologia. 2005 ; 42( 4): 239-243.[citado 2024 nov. 06 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/s0004-28032005000400009Vancouver
Ney MVS, Maluf Filho F, Sakai P, Zilberstein B, Gama Rodrigues JJ, Rosa H. Endoscopic ultrasound versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: the influence of the size of the stone and diameter of the common bile duct [Internet]. Arquivos de Gastroenterologia. 2005 ; 42( 4): 239-243.[citado 2024 nov. 06 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/s0004-28032005000400009
