Cordero-Rivera, Adolfo; Roucourt Cezário, Rodrigo; Guillermo–Ferreira, Rhainer; Lopez, Vinicius Marques 
; Sanmartín–Villar, Iago
Source: Animal Biodiversity and Conservation. Unidade: FFCLRP
Subjects: COMPORTAMENTO ANIMAL, PREDAÇÃO (BIOLOGIA), ÉTICA AMBIENTAL, FILOSOFIA
A citação é gerada automaticamente e pode não estar totalmente de acordo com as normas
ABNT
CORDERO-RIVERA, Adolfo et al. Can scientific laws be discussed on philosophical grounds: a reply to naïve arguments on ‘predators’ proposed by Bramble (2021). Animal Biodiversity and Conservation, v. 44, n. 2, p. 205-211, 2021Tradução . . Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.32800/abc.2021.44.0205. Acesso em: 25 jan. 2026.APA
Cordero-Rivera, A., Roucourt Cezário, R., Guillermo–Ferreira, R., Lopez, V. M., & Sanmartín–Villar, I. (2021). Can scientific laws be discussed on philosophical grounds: a reply to naïve arguments on ‘predators’ proposed by Bramble (2021). Animal Biodiversity and Conservation, 44( 2), 205-211. doi:10.32800/abc.2021.44.0205NLM
Cordero-Rivera A, Roucourt Cezário R, Guillermo–Ferreira R, Lopez VM, Sanmartín–Villar I. Can scientific laws be discussed on philosophical grounds: a reply to naïve arguments on ‘predators’ proposed by Bramble (2021) [Internet]. Animal Biodiversity and Conservation. 2021 ; 44( 2): 205-211.[citado 2026 jan. 25 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.32800/abc.2021.44.0205Vancouver
Cordero-Rivera A, Roucourt Cezário R, Guillermo–Ferreira R, Lopez VM, Sanmartín–Villar I. Can scientific laws be discussed on philosophical grounds: a reply to naïve arguments on ‘predators’ proposed by Bramble (2021) [Internet]. Animal Biodiversity and Conservation. 2021 ; 44( 2): 205-211.[citado 2026 jan. 25 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.32800/abc.2021.44.0205
