Macedo, Thaís Zaninetti; Okada, Dagoberto Yukio 
; Delforno, Tiago Palladino ; Braga, J. K.; Silva, Edson Luiz; Silva, Maria Bernadete Amancio Varesche
Fonte: Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering. Unidade: EESC
Assuntos: SURFACTANTES, ETANOL, SACAROSE
A citação é gerada automaticamente e pode não estar totalmente de acordo com as normas
ABNT
MACEDO, Thaís Zaninetti et al. The comparative advantages of ethanol and sucrose as co-substrates in the degradation of an anionic surfactant: microbial community selection. Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering, v. 38, p. 1835–1844, 2015Tradução . . Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-015-1424-5. Acesso em: 24 jul. 2024.APA
Macedo, T. Z., Okada, D. Y., Delforno, T. P., Braga, J. K., Silva, E. L., & Silva, M. B. A. V. (2015). The comparative advantages of ethanol and sucrose as co-substrates in the degradation of an anionic surfactant: microbial community selection. Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering, 38, 1835–1844. doi:10.1007/s00449-015-1424-5NLM
Macedo TZ, Okada DY, Delforno TP, Braga JK, Silva EL, Silva MBAV. The comparative advantages of ethanol and sucrose as co-substrates in the degradation of an anionic surfactant: microbial community selection [Internet]. Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering. 2015 ; 38 1835–1844.[citado 2024 jul. 24 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-015-1424-5Vancouver
Macedo TZ, Okada DY, Delforno TP, Braga JK, Silva EL, Silva MBAV. The comparative advantages of ethanol and sucrose as co-substrates in the degradation of an anionic surfactant: microbial community selection [Internet]. Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering. 2015 ; 38 1835–1844.[citado 2024 jul. 24 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-015-1424-5
