Source: Restoration Ecology. Unidades: IB, ESALQ, IEA
Subjects: ECOLOGIA DA RESTAURAÇÃO, FLORESTAS TROPICAIS, REFLORESTAMENTO, REVISÃO SISTEMÁTICA, MATA ATLÂNTICA
ABNT
SCHIMETKA, Lorenz R et al. Costs and benefits of restoration are still poorly quantified: evidence from a systematic literature review on the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Restoration Ecology, p. 1-14, 2024Tradução . . Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.14161. Acesso em: 18 nov. 2024.APA
Schimetka, L. R., Ruggiero, P. G. C., Carvalho, R. L. de, Behagel, J., Metzger, J. P. W., Nascimento, N. C. C. do, et al. (2024). Costs and benefits of restoration are still poorly quantified: evidence from a systematic literature review on the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Restoration Ecology, 1-14. doi:10.1111/rec.14161NLM
Schimetka LR, Ruggiero PGC, Carvalho RL de, Behagel J, Metzger JPW, Nascimento NCC do, Chaves RB, Brancalion PHS, Rodrigues RR, Krainovic PM. Costs and benefits of restoration are still poorly quantified: evidence from a systematic literature review on the Brazilian Atlantic Forest [Internet]. Restoration Ecology. 2024 ; 1-14.[citado 2024 nov. 18 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.14161Vancouver
Schimetka LR, Ruggiero PGC, Carvalho RL de, Behagel J, Metzger JPW, Nascimento NCC do, Chaves RB, Brancalion PHS, Rodrigues RR, Krainovic PM. Costs and benefits of restoration are still poorly quantified: evidence from a systematic literature review on the Brazilian Atlantic Forest [Internet]. Restoration Ecology. 2024 ; 1-14.[citado 2024 nov. 18 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.14161