Authors’ Reply [Carta]: commentary on are there differences in short-term pelvic floor muscle function after cesarean section or vaginal delivery in primiparous women? a systematic review with meta-analysis (2022)
- Authors:
- USP affiliated authors: CAVALLI, RICARDO DE CARVALHO - FMRP ; JORGE, CRISTINE HOMSI - FMRP
- Unidade: FMRP
- DOI: 10.1007/s00192-021-05000-9
- Subjects: FISIOTERAPIA; GRAVIDEZ; SOALHO PÉLVICO; CESÁREA; PARTO NORMAL
- Language: Inglês
- Imprenta:
- Source:
- Título: International Urogynecology Journal
- ISSN: 0937-3462
- Volume/Número/Paginação/Ano: v. 33, p. 165-166, 2022
- Este periódico é de acesso aberto
- Este artigo NÃO é de acesso aberto
-
ABNT
DRIUSSO, Patrícia et al. Authors’ Reply [Carta]: commentary on are there differences in short-term pelvic floor muscle function after cesarean section or vaginal delivery in primiparous women? a systematic review with meta-analysis. International Urogynecology Journal. London: Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-021-05000-9. Acesso em: 24 jan. 2026. , 2022 -
APA
Driusso, P., Beleza, A. C. S., Sato, T. de O., Cavalli, R. de C., Ferreira, C. H. J., & Moreira, R. de F. C. (2022). Authors’ Reply [Carta]: commentary on are there differences in short-term pelvic floor muscle function after cesarean section or vaginal delivery in primiparous women? a systematic review with meta-analysis. International Urogynecology Journal. London: Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo. doi:10.1007/s00192-021-05000-9 -
NLM
Driusso P, Beleza ACS, Sato T de O, Cavalli R de C, Ferreira CHJ, Moreira R de FC. Authors’ Reply [Carta]: commentary on are there differences in short-term pelvic floor muscle function after cesarean section or vaginal delivery in primiparous women? a systematic review with meta-analysis [Internet]. International Urogynecology Journal. 2022 ; 33 165-166.[citado 2026 jan. 24 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-021-05000-9 -
Vancouver
Driusso P, Beleza ACS, Sato T de O, Cavalli R de C, Ferreira CHJ, Moreira R de FC. Authors’ Reply [Carta]: commentary on are there differences in short-term pelvic floor muscle function after cesarean section or vaginal delivery in primiparous women? a systematic review with meta-analysis [Internet]. International Urogynecology Journal. 2022 ; 33 165-166.[citado 2026 jan. 24 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-021-05000-9 - Are there differences in short-term pelvic floor muscle function after cesarean section or vaginal delivery in primiparous women? A systematic review with meta-analysis
- Commentary on Are there differences in short-term pelvic floor muscle function after cesarean section or vaginal delivery in primiparous women? A systematic review with meta-analysis. [Carta]
- Maternal blood pressure and heart rate response to pelvic floor muscle training during pregnancy
- Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the childbirth experience questionnaire
- Influence of a physiotherapy protocol in maternal and fetal hemodynamics in pregnant women with preeclampsia
- Assessment of quality of life of women with preeclampsia compared with healthy pregnant women
- Assessment of quality of life of women with preeclampsia compared with healthy pregnant women
- Safety of a physical therapy protocol for women with preeclampsia: a randomized controlled feasibility trial
- Pelvic floor muscle function and EMG in nulliparous women of different ages: a cross-sectional study
- The effects of mode delivery on postpartum sexual function: a prospective study
Informações sobre o DOI: 10.1007/s00192-021-05000-9 (Fonte: oaDOI API)
Download do texto completo
| Tipo | Nome | Link | |
|---|---|---|---|
 |
003270961.pdf |
How to cite
A citação é gerada automaticamente e pode não estar totalmente de acordo com as normas
