The nature and origin of partes prudentiae in cic. Inv. 2.160 (2021)
- Autor:
- Autor USP: SCATOLIN, ADRIANO - FFLCH
- Unidade: FFLCH
- DOI: 10.11606/issn.2358-3150.v1i1p126-139
- Subjects: LITERATURA LATINA; RETÓRICA; ORATÓRIA
- Language: Inglês
- Abstract: The concept of prudentia in Cicero has deservedly received a lot of scholarly attention lately. Fundamental insights have been offered into its different uses in Latin, its relation to Greek φρόνησις, its emphasis on the semantic field of sight and on providentia, its relation to divination, and its philosophical background. One of its most important aspects, though, the understanding, linking and combining of past, present and future events in order to establish causal relationships and thus substantiate one’s decision-making process, needs to be more deeply addressed than has been done so far. I believe that some important aspects of Ciceronian prudentia have until now eluded scholars because of an understandable methodological concern to stick to the occurrences of the word (and its cognate providentia) in Cicero’s corpus. Nevertheless, by following the numerous philosophical treatments of the intellectual ability to correlate past, present and future in Cicero’s work, we will be able to get a clearer picture of Ciceronian prudentia in general and of the enumeration of its partes in De inventione. Also, we will be able to expand on Malaspina’s recent conclusion that the presentation of the parts of prudentia in De inventione is compatible with Chrysippus’ doctrine: it will be shown that Panaetius is the most likely thinker to have adapted Chrysippus’ conceptions in his reworking of Stoic doctrine.
- Imprenta:
- Source:
- Título: Letras Clássicas, Nova Série
- ISSN: 1516-4586
- Volume/Número/Paginação/Ano: v. 1, n. 1, p. 126-139, 2021
- Este periódico é de acesso aberto
- Este artigo é de acesso aberto
- URL de acesso aberto
- Cor do Acesso Aberto: gold
- Licença: cc-by-nc-sa
-
ABNT
SCATOLIN, Adriano. The nature and origin of partes prudentiae in cic. Inv. 2.160. Letras Clássicas, Nova Série, v. 1, n. 1, p. 126-139, 2021Tradução . . Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2358-3150.v1i1p126-139. Acesso em: 09 jan. 2026. -
APA
Scatolin, A. (2021). The nature and origin of partes prudentiae in cic. Inv. 2.160. Letras Clássicas, Nova Série, 1( 1), 126-139. doi:10.11606/issn.2358-3150.v1i1p126-139 -
NLM
Scatolin A. The nature and origin of partes prudentiae in cic. Inv. 2.160 [Internet]. Letras Clássicas, Nova Série. 2021 ; 1( 1): 126-139.[citado 2026 jan. 09 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2358-3150.v1i1p126-139 -
Vancouver
Scatolin A. The nature and origin of partes prudentiae in cic. Inv. 2.160 [Internet]. Letras Clássicas, Nova Série. 2021 ; 1( 1): 126-139.[citado 2026 jan. 09 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2358-3150.v1i1p126-139 - Cícero, do orador 1.24-77
- Horácio, Arte poética, 1-118
- Cícero, Do orador, 2.351–60: a memória
- Estratégias polêmicas de persuasão nos scriptores artium do séc. I a.C.
- Sátiros e sátiras na poesia antiga: estudo e tradução dos de satyrica graecorum poesi et romanorum satira libri duo, de Isaac Casaubon
- A construção do De satyrica Graecorum poësi et Romanorum satira, de Isaac Casaubon
- Tradução de Ad Familiares 5, 12, de Marco Túlio Cícero
- A invenção no Do orador de Cícero: um estudo à luz de Ad Familiares I, 9, 23
- Retórica e memória na Roma Antiga
- Cícero, Do orador, 2.51–64: a historiografia
Informações sobre o DOI: 10.11606/issn.2358-3150.v1i1p126-139 (Fonte: oaDOI API)
How to cite
A citação é gerada automaticamente e pode não estar totalmente de acordo com as normas
