A comparison of five methods to assess embolism resistance in trees (2020)
- Authors:
- Sergent, A. S
- Varela, S. A
- Barigah, T. S
- Badel, E
- Cochard, H
- Dalla-Salda, G
- Delzon, S
- Fernández, M. E - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET)
- Guillemot, Joannès
- Gyenge, J - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET)
- Lamarque, L. J
- Martinez-Meier, A
- Rozenberg, P
- Torres-Ruiz, J. M
- Martin-StPaul, N. K
- Autor USP: GUILLEMOT, JOANNÈS - ESALQ
- Unidade: ESALQ
- DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118175
- Subjects: ÁRVORES FLORESTAIS; EMBOLIA; XILEMA; MANEJO FLORESTAL; SECA
- Agências de fomento:
- Language: Inglês
- Imprenta:
- Source:
- Título do periódico: Forest Ecology and Management
- ISSN: 0378-1127
- Volume/Número/Paginação/Ano: v. 468, art. 118175, p. 1-12, 2020
- Este periódico é de assinatura
- Este artigo é de acesso aberto
- URL de acesso aberto
- Cor do Acesso Aberto: green
- Licença: cc-by-nc-sa
-
ABNT
SERGENT, A. S et al. A comparison of five methods to assess embolism resistance in trees. Forest Ecology and Management, v. 468, p. 1-12, 2020Tradução . . Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118175. Acesso em: 02 ago. 2024. -
APA
Sergent, A. S., Varela, S. A., Barigah, T. S., Badel, E., Cochard, H., Dalla-Salda, G., et al. (2020). A comparison of five methods to assess embolism resistance in trees. Forest Ecology and Management, 468, 1-12. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118175 -
NLM
Sergent AS, Varela SA, Barigah TS, Badel E, Cochard H, Dalla-Salda G, Delzon S, Fernández ME, Guillemot J, Gyenge J, Lamarque LJ, Martinez-Meier A, Rozenberg P, Torres-Ruiz JM, Martin-StPaul NK. A comparison of five methods to assess embolism resistance in trees [Internet]. Forest Ecology and Management. 2020 ; 468 1-12.[citado 2024 ago. 02 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118175 -
Vancouver
Sergent AS, Varela SA, Barigah TS, Badel E, Cochard H, Dalla-Salda G, Delzon S, Fernández ME, Guillemot J, Gyenge J, Lamarque LJ, Martinez-Meier A, Rozenberg P, Torres-Ruiz JM, Martin-StPaul NK. A comparison of five methods to assess embolism resistance in trees [Internet]. Forest Ecology and Management. 2020 ; 468 1-12.[citado 2024 ago. 02 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118175 - Tree diversity reduces variability in sapling survival under drought
- For the sake of resilience and multifunctionality, let’s diversify planted forests!
- Isohydricity and hydraulic isolation explain reduced hydraulic failure risk in an experimental tree species mixture
- Proximal microclimate: moving beyond spatiotemporal resolution improves ecological predictions
- Neighbourhood species richness and drought‐tolerance traits modulate tree growth and δ13 C responses to drought
- Native coffee agroforestry in the Western Ghats of India maintains higher carbon storage and tree diversity compared to exotic agroforestry
- Neighbourhood-mediated shifts in tree biomass allocation drive overyielding in tropical species mixtures
- Enhancing tree performance through species mixing: review of a quarter-century of treeDivNet experiments reveals research Gaps and practical insights
- Potassium limitation of forest productivity: Part 2: CASTANEA-MAESPA-K shows a reduction in photosynthesis rather than a stoichiometric limitation of tissue formation
- Potassium limitation of wood productivity: A review of elementary processes and ways forward to modelling illustrated by Eucalyptus plantations
Informações sobre o DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118175 (Fonte: oaDOI API)
Download do texto completo
| Tipo | Nome | Link | |
|---|---|---|---|
 | 2997849-A_comparison_of_f... | Direct link |
How to cite
A citação é gerada automaticamente e pode não estar totalmente de acordo com as normas
