Exportar registro bibliográfico


Metrics:

Evaluating variability at the software architecture level: an overview (2019)

  • Authors:
  • Autor USP: NAKAGAWA, ELISA YUMI - ICMC
  • Unidade: ICMC
  • DOI: 10.1145/3297280.3297511
  • Assunto: ARQUITETURA DE SOFTWARE
  • Keywords: software variability; systematic mapping study
  • Agências de fomento:
  • Language: Inglês
  • Imprenta:
  • Source:
  • Conference titles: Symposium on Applied Computing - SAC
  • Acesso à fonteDOI
    Informações sobre o DOI: 10.1145/3297280.3297511 (Fonte: oaDOI API)
    • Este periódico é de assinatura
    • Este artigo NÃO é de acesso aberto
    • Cor do Acesso Aberto: closed

    How to cite
    A citação é gerada automaticamente e pode não estar totalmente de acordo com as normas

    • ABNT

      ALLIAN, Ana Paula; SENA, Bruno; NAKAGAWA, Elisa Yumi. Evaluating variability at the software architecture level: an overview. Anais.. New York: ACM, 2019.Disponível em: DOI: 10.1145/3297280.3297511.
    • APA

      Allian, A. P., Sena, B., & Nakagawa, E. Y. (2019). Evaluating variability at the software architecture level: an overview. In Proceedings. New York: ACM. doi:10.1145/3297280.3297511
    • NLM

      Allian AP, Sena B, Nakagawa EY. Evaluating variability at the software architecture level: an overview [Internet]. Proceedings. 2019 ;Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3297280.3297511
    • Vancouver

      Allian AP, Sena B, Nakagawa EY. Evaluating variability at the software architecture level: an overview [Internet]. Proceedings. 2019 ;Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3297280.3297511

    Referências citadas na obra
    Faheem Ahmed and Luiz Fernando Capretz. 2015. An Architecture Process Maturity Model of Software Product Line Engineering. CoRR abs/1507.06901 (2015), 191--207.
    Peter Andersen and Andrea Carugati. 2014. Enterprise Architecture Evaluation: a Systematic literature Review. In 8th Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems, MCIS. AISeL, Verona, Italy, 41.
    Samuil Angelov, Jos J. M. Trienekens, and Paul W. P. J. Grefen. 2008. Towards a Method for the Evaluation of Reference Architectures: Experiences from a Case. In Software Architecture, Second European Conference, ECSA. Springer, Paphos, Cyprus, 225--240.
    Paris Avgeriou. 2003. Describing, instantiating and evaluating a reference architecture: A case study. Enterprise Architecture Journal 342 (2003), 1--24.
    Muhammad Ali Babar. 2004. Scenarios, Quality Attributes, and Patterns: Capturing and Using their Synergistic Relationships for Product Line Architectures. In 11th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference APSEC. IEEE Computer Society, Busan, Korea, 574--578.
    K. Suzanne Barber, Thomas J. Graser, and Jim Holt. 2003. Evaluating dynamic correctness properties of domain reference architectures. Journal of Systems and Software 68, 3 (2003), 217--231.
    K. Suzanne Barber, Jim Holt, and Geoff Baker. 2002. Performance evaluation of domain reference architectures. In 14th international conference on Software engineering and knowledge engineering, SEKE. ACM, Ischia, Italy, 225--232.
    Rafael Ferreira Barcelos and Guilherme Horta Travassos. 2006. Evaluation Approaches for Software Architectural Documents: a Systematic Review. In Memorias de la IX Conferenci a Iberoamericana de Software Engineering (CIbSE 2006). La Plata, Argentina, 433--446.
    Balbir S. Barn. 2009. On the evaluation of reference models for software engineering practice. In 2nd Annual India Software Engineering Conference, ISEC. ACM, Pune, India, 111--116.
    Rabih Bashroush, Muhammad Garba, Rick Rabiser, Iris Groher, and Goetz Botterweck. 2017. CASE Tool Support for Variability Management in Software Product Lines. ACM Comput. Surv. 50, 1 (2017), 14:1--14:45.
    J. Bosch, R. Capilla, and R. Hilliard. 2015. Trends in Systems and Software Variability. IEEE Software 32, 3 (2015), 44--51.
    Rafael Capilla, J. Bosch, and K. C. Kang. 2013. Systems and Software Variability Management: Concepts, Tools and Experiences. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg.
    Lianping Chen, Muhammad Ali Babar, and Nour Ali. 2009. Variability management in software product lines: a systematic review. In 13th International Conference on Software Product Lines (SPLC). ACM, San Francisco, California, USA, 81--90.
    Simone da Silva Amorim, John D. McGregor, Eduardo Santana de Almeida, and Christina von Flach G. Chavez. 2015. Tailoring the ATAM for Software Ecosystems. In 9th European Conference on Software Architecture, ECSA. Springer, Dubrovnik/Cavtat, Croatia, 372--380.
    Edson Alves de Oliveira Junior, Itana Maria de Souza Gimenes, and José Carlos Maldonado. 2011. A Meta-Process to Support Trade-Off Analysis in Software Product Line Architecture. In 23rd International Conference on Software Engineering & Knowledge Engineering (SEKE). Knowledge Systems Institute Graduate School, Miami Beach, USA, 687--692.
    Liliana Dobrica and Eila Ovaska. 2011. Analysis of a cross-domain reference architecture using change scenarios. In 5th European Conference on Software Architecture, ECSA. ACM, Essen, Germany, 10.
    Nancy S. Eickelmann and Debra J. Richardson. 1996. An Evaluation of Software Test Environment Architectures. In 18th International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE. IEEE Computer Society, Berlin, Germany, 353--364.
    L. Etxeberria and G. Sagardui. 2008. Quality assessment in software product lines. In 10th international conference on Software Reuse: High Confidence Software Reuse in Large Systems (ICSR). Beijing, China, 178--181.
    L. Etxeberria and G. Sagardui. 2008. Variability driven quality evaluation in software product lines. In 12th International Software Product Line Conference (SPLC 2008). Limerick, Ireland, 243--252.
    Michael Falkenthal, Dierk Jugel, Alfred Zimmermann, René Reiners, Wilfried Reimann, and Michael Pretz. 2012. Maturity Assessments of Service-oriented Enterprise Architectures with Iterative Pattern Refinement. In Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI). GI, Braunschweig, Deutschland, 1095--1101.
    Matthias Galster. 2015. Architecting for Variability in Quality Attributes of Software Systems. In 2015 European Conference on Software Architecture. ACM, Dubrovnik/Cavtat, Croatia, 23:1--23:4.
    Matthias Galster and Paris Avgeriou. 2011. Handling Variability in Software Architecture: Problems and Implications. In 9th Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture (WICSA). IEEE Computer Society, Colorado, USA, 171--180.
    Matthias Galster and Paris Avgeriou. 2013. Supporting Variability Through Agility to Achieve Adaptable Architectures. In Agile Software Architectures-Aligning Agile Processes and Softare Architectures. Vol. 1. Elsevier, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA, 139--159.
    Bas Graaf, Hylke W. van Dijk, and Arie van Deursen. 2005. Evaluating an Embedded Software Reference Architecture - Industrial Experience Report. In 9th European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering CSMR. IEEE Computer Society, Manchester, UK, 354--363.
    V. Guana and D. Correal. 2011. Variability quality evaluation on component-based software product lines. In 15th International Software Product Line Conference (SPLC 2011). Munich, Germany, 19:1--19:8.
    R. Kazman, L. Bass, G. Abowd, and M. Webb. 1994. SAAM: a method for analyzing the properties of software architectures. In 16th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 1994). Sorrento, Italy, 81--90.
    R. Kazman, M. Klein, M. Barbacci, T. Longstaff, H. Lipson, and J. Carriere. 1998. The architecture tradeoff analysis method. In 4th IEEE International Conference on Engineering of Complex Computer Systems (ICECCS 1998). Monterey, CA, USA, 68--78.
    Kangtae Kim, Hyungrok Kim, Sundeok Kim, and Gihun Chang. 2008. A Case Study on SW Product Line Architecture Evaluation: Experience in the Consumer Electronics Domain. In 3rd International Conference on Software Engineering Advances, ICSEA. IEEE Computer Society, Sliema, Malta, 192--197.
    Soo Dong Kim, Soo Ho Chang, and Hyun Jung La. 2005. A Systematic Process to Design Product Line Architecture. In International Conference Computational Science and Its Applications (ICCSA). Springer, Singapore, 46--56.
    Taeho Kim, In-Young Ko, Sungwon Kang, and Danhyung Lee. 2008. Extending ATAM to assess product line architecture. In 8th IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Technology, CIT. IEEE Computer Society, Sydney, Australia, 790--797.
    T. Kim, I.-Y. Ko, S.-W. Kang, and D.-H. Lee. 2008. Extending ATAM to assess product line architecture. In IEEE 8th International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (CIT 2008). Sydney, NSW, Australia, 790--797.
    Barbara Kitchenham and Stuart Charters. 2007. Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering. Technical Report. Keele University and Durham University Joint Report. 57 pages.
    Robyn R. Lutz and Gerald C. Gannod. 2003. Analysis of a software product line architecture: an experience report. Journal of Systems and Software 66, 3 (2003), 253--267.
    Silverio Juan Martínez Fernández, Claudia Patricia Ayala Martínez, Javier Franch Gutiérrez, Helena Martins Marques, and David Ameller. 2013. A framework for software reference architecture analysis and review. In Memorias del X Workshop Latinoamericano Ingeniería de Software Experimental, ESELAW. Montevideo, Uruguay, 89--102.
    John D. McGregor, J. Yates Monteith, and Jie Zhang. 2011. Quantifying value in software product line design. In 15th International Conference on Software Product Lines, SPLC. ACM, Munich, Germany, 40.
    Vojislav B. Misic. 2003. Measuring the Coherence of Software Product Line Architectures. In International Conference on Software Engineering Research and Practice, SERP. CSREA Press, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, 364--372.
    Elisa Yumi Nakagawa, Flávio Oquendo, and Martin Becker. 2012. RAModel: A Reference Model for Reference Architectures. In Joint Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture and European Conference on Software Architecture (WICSA/ECSA). Helsinki, Finland, 297--301.
    E.A. Oliveira Junior, I.M.S. Gimenes, J.C. Maldonado, P.C. Masiero, and L. Barroca. 2013. Systematic evaluation of software product line architectures. Journal of Universal Computer Science 19, 1 (2013), 25--52.
    Femi G. Olumofin and Vojislav B. Misic. 2005. Extending the ATAM Architecture Evaluation to Product Line Architectures. In 5th Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture (WICSA). IEEE Computer Society, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, 45--56.
    Femi G. Olumofin and Vojislav B. Misic. 2007. A holistic architecture assessment method for software product lines. Information &#38
    Software Technology 49, 4 (2007), 309--323.
    Sofia Ouhbi. 2018. Software Architecture Evaluation: A Systematic Mapping Study. In 13th International Conference on Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering, ENASE. SciTePress, Funchal, Madeira, Portugal, 447--454.
    Juliana Alves Pereira, Kattiana Constantino, and Eduardo Figueiredo. 2015. A Systematic Literature Review of Software Product Line Management Tools. In 14th International Conference on Software Reuse for Dynamic Systems in the Cloud and Beyond (ICSR). Springer International Publishing, Miami, FL, USA, 73--89.
    Kai Petersen, Sairam Vakkalanka, and Ludwik Kuzniarz. 2015. Guidelines for conducting systematic mapping studies in software engineering: An update. Information &#38
    Software Technology 64, C (2015), 1--18.
    Ville Reijonen, Johannes Koskinen, and Ilkka J. Haikala. 2010. Experiences from Scenario-Based Architecture Evaluations with ATAM. In 4th European Conference Software Architecture, ECSA. Springer, Copenhagen, Denmark, 214--229.
    J.F.M. Santos, Milena Guessi, M Galster, Daniel Feitosa, and Elisa Nakagawa. 2013. A checklist for evaluation of reference architectures of embedded systems. In International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering (SEKE 2013), Vol. 2013. Boston, USA, 451--454.
    L. Tan, Y. Lin, and H. Ye. 2012. Modeling Quality Attributes in Software Product Line Architecture. In 2012 Spring Congress on Engineering and Technology. IEEE, Xian, China, 1--5.
    Andrzej Zalewski. 2007. Beyond ATAM: Architecture Analysis in the Development of Large Scale Software Systems. In 1st European Conference on Software Architecture, ECSA. Springer, Aranjuez, Spain, 92--105.
    Alfred Zimmermann, Helge Buckow, Hans-Jürgen Groß, Oliver F. Nandico, Gunther Piller, and Karl Prott. 2011. Capability Diagnostics of Enterprise Service Architectures Using a Dedicated Software Architecture Reference Model. In IEEE International Conference on Services Computing, SCC. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 592--599.
    Alfred Zimmermann and G Zimmermann. 2011. Esarc-enterprise services architecture reference cube for capability assessments of service-oriented systems. SERVICE COMPUTATION 2011 (2011), 63--68.

Digital Library of Intellectual Production of Universidade de São Paulo     2012 - 2020