Selecting the most relevant brain regions to discriminate Alzheimer's disease patients from healthy controls using multiple kernel learning: a comparison across functional and structural imaging modalities and atlases (2018)
- Authors:
- USP affiliated authors: LEITE, CLAUDIA DA COSTA - FM ; NITRINI, RICARDO - FM ; BUCHPIGUEL, CARLOS ALBERTO - FM ; BUSATTO FILHO, GERALDO - FM
- Unidade: FM
- DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2017.10.026
- Subjects: IMAGEM POR RESSONÂNCIA MAGNÉTICA; DIAGNÓSTICO POR IMAGEM; DOENÇA DE ALZHEIMER; MORFOMETRIA
- Agências de fomento:
- Language: Inglês
- Imprenta:
- Source:
- Título: Neuroimage-clinical
- ISSN: 2213-1582
- Volume/Número/Paginação/Ano: v. 17, p. 628-641, 2018
- Status:
- Artigo publicado em periódico de acesso aberto (Gold Open Access)
- Versão do Documento:
- Versão publicada (Published version)
- Acessar versão aberta:
-
ABNT
RONDINA, Jane Maryam et al. Selecting the most relevant brain regions to discriminate Alzheimer's disease patients from healthy controls using multiple kernel learning: a comparison across functional and structural imaging modalities and atlases. Neuroimage-clinical, v. 17, p. 628-641, 2018Tradução . . Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2017.10.026. Acesso em: 02 abr. 2026. -
APA
Rondina, J. M., Leite, C. C., Nitrini, R., Buchpiguel, C. A., & Busatto Filho, G. (2018). Selecting the most relevant brain regions to discriminate Alzheimer's disease patients from healthy controls using multiple kernel learning: a comparison across functional and structural imaging modalities and atlases. Neuroimage-clinical, 17, 628-641. doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2017.10.026 -
NLM
Rondina JM, Leite CC, Nitrini R, Buchpiguel CA, Busatto Filho G. Selecting the most relevant brain regions to discriminate Alzheimer's disease patients from healthy controls using multiple kernel learning: a comparison across functional and structural imaging modalities and atlases [Internet]. Neuroimage-clinical. 2018 ; 17 628-641.[citado 2026 abr. 02 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2017.10.026 -
Vancouver
Rondina JM, Leite CC, Nitrini R, Buchpiguel CA, Busatto Filho G. Selecting the most relevant brain regions to discriminate Alzheimer's disease patients from healthy controls using multiple kernel learning: a comparison across functional and structural imaging modalities and atlases [Internet]. Neuroimage-clinical. 2018 ; 17 628-641.[citado 2026 abr. 02 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2017.10.026 - Support vector machine-based classification of neuroimages in Alzheimer's disease: direct comparison of FDG-PET, rCBF-SPECT and MRI data acquired from the same individuals
- Diagnosis of regional cerebral blood flow abnormalities using SPECT: agreement between individualized statistical parametric maps and visual inspection by nuclear medicine physicians with different levels of expertise in nuclear neurology
- Diagnosing preclinical and clinical Alzheimer's disease with visual atrophy scales in the clinical practice
- Episodic Memory, Hippocampal Volume, and Function for Classification of Mild Cognitive Impairment Patients Regarding Amyloid Pathology
- Methodologial comparison between nuclear physician with different levels of experience with Statistical Parametric Mapping in neurological disorders
- PET vs SPECT in Alzheimer patients. A controlled study
- Hippocampal subregional volume changes in elders classified using positron emission tomographybased Alzheimer's biomarkers of β-amyloid deposition and neurodegeneration
- Pet vs Spect em pacientes com doença de alzheimer
- Imaging substrates in early Alzheimer's disease: A spect, FDG-PET and volumetric MRI correlation study
- A voxel morphometry study of temporal lobe gray matter reductions in Alzheimer's disease
Informações sobre a disponibilidade de versões do artigo em acesso aberto coletadas automaticamente via oaDOI API (Unpaywall).
Por se tratar de integração com serviço externo, podem existir diferentes versões do trabalho (como preprints ou postprints), que podem diferir da versão publicada.
How to cite
A citação é gerada automaticamente e pode não estar totalmente de acordo com as normas