Dydrogesterone vs progesterone for luteal-phase support: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (2016)
- Authors:
- USP affiliated authors: NAVARRO, PAULA ANDREA DE ALBUQUERQUE SALLES - FMRP ; FERRIANI, RUI ALBERTO - FMRP ; MARTINS, WELLINGTON DE PAULA - FMRP
- Unidade: FMRP
- DOI: 10.1002/uog.15814
- Subjects: PROGESTERONA; TÉCNICAS DE REPRODUÇÃO; INFERTILIDADE FEMININA
- Agências de fomento:
- Language: Inglês
- Imprenta:
- Publisher place: West Sussex
- Date published: 2016
- Source:
- Título: Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- ISSN: 0960-7692
- Volume/Número/Paginação/Ano: v. 48, n. 2, p. 161-170, 2016
- Este periódico é de assinatura
- Este artigo é de acesso aberto
- URL de acesso aberto
- Cor do Acesso Aberto: bronze
-
ABNT
BARBOSA, M. W. P. et al. Dydrogesterone vs progesterone for luteal-phase support: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, v. 48, n. 2, p. 161-170, 2016Tradução . . Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.15814. Acesso em: 27 dez. 2025. -
APA
Barbosa, M. W. P., Silva, L. R., Navarro, P. A. de A. S., Ferriani, R. A., Nastri, C. O., & Martins, W. de P. (2016). Dydrogesterone vs progesterone for luteal-phase support: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 48( 2), 161-170. doi:10.1002/uog.15814 -
NLM
Barbosa MWP, Silva LR, Navarro PA de AS, Ferriani RA, Nastri CO, Martins W de P. Dydrogesterone vs progesterone for luteal-phase support: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [Internet]. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2016 ; 48( 2): 161-170.[citado 2025 dez. 27 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.15814 -
Vancouver
Barbosa MWP, Silva LR, Navarro PA de AS, Ferriani RA, Nastri CO, Martins W de P. Dydrogesterone vs progesterone for luteal-phase support: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [Internet]. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2016 ; 48( 2): 161-170.[citado 2025 dez. 27 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.15814 - GnRH agonist during luteal phase for women undergoing assisted reproductive techniques: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- Time-lapse embryo imaging for improving reproductive outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis
- Antral follicle count might be underestimated in the presence of an ovarian endometrioma. [Cartal]
- Dydrogesterone versus progesterone for luteal-phase support: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- An attempt to reduce the costs of assisted reproductive techniques: a pilot randomised controlled trial
- Assessment of sexual function in infertile women in a gynecological care setting
- Ovarian response is a rather than thin endometrium or the presence of an endometrioma is a better predictor of clinical pregnancy rates following embryo transfer than is thin endometrium or presence of an endometrioma
- Subclinical hypothyroidism and intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes
- Effect of endometriosis on the functional ovarian reserve and on the reproductive outcomes of women undergoing assisted reproductive techniques
- A formula combining age, AMH, AFC and FSH is more accurate than individual markers in predicting poor response to controlled ovarian stimulation in good prognosis patients
Informações sobre o DOI: 10.1002/uog.15814 (Fonte: oaDOI API)
How to cite
A citação é gerada automaticamente e pode não estar totalmente de acordo com as normas
