Dydrogesterone vs progesterone for luteal-phase support: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (2016)
- Authors:
- USP affiliated authors: NAVARRO, PAULA ANDREA DE ALBUQUERQUE SALLES - FMRP ; FERRIANI, RUI ALBERTO - FMRP ; MARTINS, WELLINGTON DE PAULA - FMRP
- Unidade: FMRP
- DOI: 10.1002/uog.15814
- Subjects: PROGESTERONA; TÉCNICAS DE REPRODUÇÃO; INFERTILIDADE FEMININA
- Agências de fomento:
- Language: Inglês
- Imprenta:
- Publisher place: West Sussex
- Date published: 2016
- Source:
- Título: Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- ISSN: 0960-7692
- Volume/Número/Paginação/Ano: v. 48, n. 2, p. 161-170, 2016
- Status:
- Artigo possui acesso gratuito no site do editor (Bronze Open Access)
- Versão do Documento:
- Versão publicada (Published version)
- Acessar versão aberta:
-
ABNT
BARBOSA, M. W. P. et al. Dydrogesterone vs progesterone for luteal-phase support: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, v. 48, n. 2, p. 161-170, 2016Tradução . . Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.15814. Acesso em: 30 mar. 2026. -
APA
Barbosa, M. W. P., Silva, L. R., Navarro, P. A. de A. S., Ferriani, R. A., Nastri, C. O., & Martins, W. de P. (2016). Dydrogesterone vs progesterone for luteal-phase support: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 48( 2), 161-170. doi:10.1002/uog.15814 -
NLM
Barbosa MWP, Silva LR, Navarro PA de AS, Ferriani RA, Nastri CO, Martins W de P. Dydrogesterone vs progesterone for luteal-phase support: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [Internet]. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2016 ; 48( 2): 161-170.[citado 2026 mar. 30 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.15814 -
Vancouver
Barbosa MWP, Silva LR, Navarro PA de AS, Ferriani RA, Nastri CO, Martins W de P. Dydrogesterone vs progesterone for luteal-phase support: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [Internet]. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2016 ; 48( 2): 161-170.[citado 2026 mar. 30 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.15814 - Effect of endometriosis on the functional ovarian reserve and on the reproductive outcomes of women undergoing assisted reproductive techniques
- Impact of endometriosis and its staging on assisted reproduction outcome: systematic review and meta-analysis
- GnRH agonist during luteal phase for women undergoing assisted reproductive techniques: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
- Dydrogesterone versus progesterone for luteal-phase support: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- Time-lapse embryo imaging for improving reproductive outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis
- An attempt to reduce the costs of assisted reproductive techniques: a pilot randomised controlled trial
- Antral follicle count might be underestimated in the presence of an ovarian endometrioma. [Cartal]
- Ovarian response is a rather than thin endometrium or the presence of an endometrioma is a better predictor of clinical pregnancy rates following embryo transfer than is thin endometrium or presence of an endometrioma
- Assessment of sexual function in infertile women in a gynecological care setting
- A formula combining age, AMH, AFC and FSH is more accurate than individual markers in predicting poor response to controlled ovarian stimulation in good prognosis patients
Informações sobre a disponibilidade de versões do artigo em acesso aberto coletadas automaticamente via oaDOI API (Unpaywall).
Por se tratar de integração com serviço externo, podem existir diferentes versões do trabalho (como preprints ou postprints), que podem diferir da versão publicada.
How to cite
A citação é gerada automaticamente e pode não estar totalmente de acordo com as normas
