Influence of adhesive system and placement technique on microleakage of resin-based composite restorations (2004)
- Authors:
- Autor USP: CARDOSO, PAULO EDUARDO CAPEL - FO
- Unidade: FO
- Subjects: ADESIVOS DENTINÁRIOS; MATERIAIS DENTÁRIOS; MICROINFILTRAÇÃO MARGINAL
- Language: Inglês
- Abstract: PURPOSE: To analyze the influence of two placement techniques and two adhesive systems on the marginal microleakage of Class II resin-based composite restorations using different resin composite materials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred standardized Class II cavities (5 mm x 3 mm x 1.5 mm) were cut in human premolars and restored using five resin composite materials (A.L.E.R.T.-AL, Solitaire-SO, SureFil-SU, Filtek A110-A, and Z100-Z), two adhesive systems (Bond 1-B1 and Etch & Prime 3.0-EP), and two placement techniques (incremental or bulk). Specimens were thermocycled (700 cycles, 5 degrees - 55 degrees C, 1 min dwell time), immersed in 0.5% methylene blue solution for 4 h, and sectioned longitudinally to evaluate the extent of microleakage. Data were submitted to statistical analysis using the Kruskal-Wallis test. RESULTS: It was observed that both adhesive systems presented similar results (p > 0.05), and neither achieved complete marginal sealing. The bulk placement technique led to greater microleakage than the incremental technique (p < 0.001). Restorations prepared using SO resin composite showed greater microleakage than those performed using Z or AL materials. However, SO obtained similar values of microleakage when compared to SU and A materials. CONCLUSION: The use of incremental placement technique resulted in less microleakage for Class II resin-based composite restorations. No difference was observed among adhesive systems regardingprevention of marginal dye penetration. Furthermore, the type of resin composite material employed for restoration may have an influence on the extent of microleakage
- Imprenta:
- Publisher place: New Maldin
- Date published: 2004
- Source:
- Título do periódico: The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry
- ISSN: 1461-5185
- Volume/Número/Paginação/Ano: v. 6, n. 3, p. 227-232, 2004
-
ABNT
POSKUS, Laiza T e PLACIDO, Eliane e CARDOSO, Paulo Eduardo Capel. Influence of adhesive system and placement technique on microleakage of resin-based composite restorations. The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, v. 6, n. 3, p. 227-232, 2004Tradução . . Acesso em: 06 ago. 2024. -
APA
Poskus, L. T., Placido, E., & Cardoso, P. E. C. (2004). Influence of adhesive system and placement technique on microleakage of resin-based composite restorations. The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, 6( 3), 227-232. -
NLM
Poskus LT, Placido E, Cardoso PEC. Influence of adhesive system and placement technique on microleakage of resin-based composite restorations. The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2004 ; 6( 3): 227-232.[citado 2024 ago. 06 ] -
Vancouver
Poskus LT, Placido E, Cardoso PEC. Influence of adhesive system and placement technique on microleakage of resin-based composite restorations. The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2004 ; 6( 3): 227-232.[citado 2024 ago. 06 ] - Dureza Knoop de resinas compostas e compômeros
- Avaliação da microinfiltração e dureza superficial de uma nova resina composta condensável
- Microleakage of class V composite restorations using five simplified adhesives
- Análise da resistência à flexão de 8 resinas compostas condensáveis e 4 híbridas
- Análise da rugosidade superficial de sete resinas compostas condesáveis e quatro híbridas
- Microleakage of composite resin restorations using a flowable resin
- Enamel microtensile bond strengths of self-etching primers
- Evaluation microleakage of the difference association with amalgam and adhesive
- Clinical evaluation of wear resin restoration in posterior teeth
- Analysis of the surface roughness of seven condensable and four hybrid composite resins
How to cite
A citação é gerada automaticamente e pode não estar totalmente de acordo com as normas