Fonte: Restoration Ecology. Unidades: IB, ESALQ, IEA
Assuntos: ECOLOGIA DA RESTAURAÇÃO, FLORESTAS TROPICAIS, REFLORESTAMENTO, REVISÃO SISTEMÁTICA, MATA ATLÂNTICA
ABNT
SCHIMETKA, Lorenz R et al. Costs and benefits of restoration are still poorly quantified: evidence from a systematic literature review on the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Restoration Ecology, v. 32, n. 5, p. 1-14, 2024Tradução . . Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.14161. Acesso em: 08 out. 2025.APA
Schimetka, L. R., Ruggiero, P. G. C., Carvalho, R. L. de, Behagel, J., Metzger, J. -P., Nascimento, N. C. C. do, et al. (2024). Costs and benefits of restoration are still poorly quantified: evidence from a systematic literature review on the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Restoration Ecology, 32( 5), 1-14. doi:10.1111/rec.14161NLM
Schimetka LR, Ruggiero PGC, Carvalho RL de, Behagel J, Metzger J-P, Nascimento NCC do, Chaves RB, Brancalion PHS, Rodrigues RR, Krainovic PM. Costs and benefits of restoration are still poorly quantified: evidence from a systematic literature review on the Brazilian Atlantic Forest [Internet]. Restoration Ecology. 2024 ; 32( 5): 1-14.[citado 2025 out. 08 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.14161Vancouver
Schimetka LR, Ruggiero PGC, Carvalho RL de, Behagel J, Metzger J-P, Nascimento NCC do, Chaves RB, Brancalion PHS, Rodrigues RR, Krainovic PM. Costs and benefits of restoration are still poorly quantified: evidence from a systematic literature review on the Brazilian Atlantic Forest [Internet]. Restoration Ecology. 2024 ; 32( 5): 1-14.[citado 2025 out. 08 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.14161