Fonte: Clinical Oral Implants Research. Unidade: FO
Assuntos: SUBSTITUTOS ÓSSEOS, ANÁLISE REFRATOMÉTRICA, TECIDO ELÁSTICO
A citação é gerada automaticamente e pode não estar totalmente de acordo com as normas
ABNT
SAPATA, Vitor Marques et al. Deproteinized bovine bone mineral is non-inferior to deproteinized bovine bone mineral with 10% collagen in maintaining the soft tissue contour post-extraction: arandomized trial. Clinical Oral Implants Research. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13570. Acesso em: 08 out. 2024. , 2019APA
Sapata, V. M., Llanos, A. H., César Neto, J. B., Jung, R. E., Thoma, D. S., Hämmerle, C. H. F., et al. (2019). Deproteinized bovine bone mineral is non-inferior to deproteinized bovine bone mineral with 10% collagen in maintaining the soft tissue contour post-extraction: arandomized trial. Clinical Oral Implants Research. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc. doi:10.1111/clr.13570NLM
Sapata VM, Llanos AH, César Neto JB, Jung RE, Thoma DS, Hämmerle CHF, Pannuti CM, Romito GA. Deproteinized bovine bone mineral is non-inferior to deproteinized bovine bone mineral with 10% collagen in maintaining the soft tissue contour post-extraction: arandomized trial [Internet]. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2019 ;[citado 2024 out. 08 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13570Vancouver
Sapata VM, Llanos AH, César Neto JB, Jung RE, Thoma DS, Hämmerle CHF, Pannuti CM, Romito GA. Deproteinized bovine bone mineral is non-inferior to deproteinized bovine bone mineral with 10% collagen in maintaining the soft tissue contour post-extraction: arandomized trial [Internet]. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2019 ;[citado 2024 out. 08 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13570