Source: Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research. Unidade: FOB
Subjects: MALOCLUSÃO DE ANGLE CLASSE II, ORTODONTIA CORRETIVA, APARELHO ORTODÔNTICO FUNCIONAL
ABNT
PUPULIM, Daniela Cubas et al. Class II treatment effects with fixed functional appliances: Jasper jumper vs. Forsus fatigue resistant device. Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research, v. 25, n. 1, p. 134-141, 2022Tradução . . Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12515. Acesso em: 16 nov. 2024.APA
Pupulim, D. C., Henriques, J. F. C., Freitas, K. M. S. de, Fontes, F. P. H., & Fernandes, T. M. F. (2022). Class II treatment effects with fixed functional appliances: Jasper jumper vs. Forsus fatigue resistant device. Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research, 25( 1), 134-141. doi:10.1111/ocr.12515NLM
Pupulim DC, Henriques JFC, Freitas KMS de, Fontes FPH, Fernandes TMF. Class II treatment effects with fixed functional appliances: Jasper jumper vs. Forsus fatigue resistant device [Internet]. Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research. 2022 ; 25( 1): 134-141.[citado 2024 nov. 16 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12515Vancouver
Pupulim DC, Henriques JFC, Freitas KMS de, Fontes FPH, Fernandes TMF. Class II treatment effects with fixed functional appliances: Jasper jumper vs. Forsus fatigue resistant device [Internet]. Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research. 2022 ; 25( 1): 134-141.[citado 2024 nov. 16 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12515