Fonte: Fertility and Sterility. Nome do evento: Annual Meeting of American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM). Unidade: FMRP
Assuntos: PROGESTERONA, REVISÃO SISTEMÁTICA
ABNT
MARTINS, Wellington de Paula et al. Dydrogesterone versus progesterone for luteal-phase support: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Fertility and Sterility. Philadelphia: Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo. Disponível em: http://www.fertstert.org/article/S0015-0282(15)01579-4/pdf. Acesso em: 24 maio 2024. , 2015APA
Martins, W. de P., Barbosa, M. W., Silva, L. R., Navarro, P. A. de A. S., Ferriani, R. A., & Nastri, C. O. (2015). Dydrogesterone versus progesterone for luteal-phase support: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Fertility and Sterility. Philadelphia: Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo. Recuperado de http://www.fertstert.org/article/S0015-0282(15)01579-4/pdfNLM
Martins W de P, Barbosa MW, Silva LR, Navarro PA de AS, Ferriani RA, Nastri CO. Dydrogesterone versus progesterone for luteal-phase support: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [Internet]. Fertility and Sterility. 2015 ; 104( 3): e345-e346.[citado 2024 maio 24 ] Available from: http://www.fertstert.org/article/S0015-0282(15)01579-4/pdfVancouver
Martins W de P, Barbosa MW, Silva LR, Navarro PA de AS, Ferriani RA, Nastri CO. Dydrogesterone versus progesterone for luteal-phase support: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [Internet]. Fertility and Sterility. 2015 ; 104( 3): e345-e346.[citado 2024 maio 24 ] Available from: http://www.fertstert.org/article/S0015-0282(15)01579-4/pdf