Lawley, Jonathan Wanderley; Chiaverano, Luciano M; Gamero-Mora, Edgar; Maronna, Maximiliano Manuel; Collins, Allen G; Hopcroft, Russell R; Stampar, Sérgio Nascimento; Morandini, André Carrara 
Source: South African Journal Of Science. Unidades: CEBIMAR, IB
Subjects: CNIDARIA, ZOOLOGIA (CLASSIFICAÇÃO)
A citação é gerada automaticamente e pode não estar totalmente de acordo com as normas
ABNT
LAWLEY, Jonathan Wanderley et al. Morphology is not always useful for diagnosis, and that's ok: Species hypotheses should not be bound to a class of data. Reply to Brown and Gibbons. South African Journal Of Science, 2022Tradução . . Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2022/14495. Acesso em: 31 maio 2024.APA
Lawley, J. W., Chiaverano, L. M., Gamero-Mora, E., Maronna, M. M., Collins, A. G., Hopcroft, R. R., et al. (2022). Morphology is not always useful for diagnosis, and that's ok: Species hypotheses should not be bound to a class of data. Reply to Brown and Gibbons. South African Journal Of Science. doi:10.17159/sajs.2022/14495NLM
Lawley JW, Chiaverano LM, Gamero-Mora E, Maronna MM, Collins AG, Hopcroft RR, Stampar SN, Morandini AC. Morphology is not always useful for diagnosis, and that's ok: Species hypotheses should not be bound to a class of data. Reply to Brown and Gibbons [Internet]. South African Journal Of Science. 2022 ;[citado 2024 maio 31 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2022/14495Vancouver
Lawley JW, Chiaverano LM, Gamero-Mora E, Maronna MM, Collins AG, Hopcroft RR, Stampar SN, Morandini AC. Morphology is not always useful for diagnosis, and that's ok: Species hypotheses should not be bound to a class of data. Reply to Brown and Gibbons [Internet]. South African Journal Of Science. 2022 ;[citado 2024 maio 31 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2022/14495
